Français  |  Text size: A A A
Home > Resource for Educators > Introduction to Accessible Education

Introduction to Accessible Education

Do students learn as much as they can from your teaching?

Accessible Educationi is the process of designing courses and developing a teaching style to meet the needs of people from a variety of backgrounds, abilities and learning styles. Just as there is no single way to teach, people learn in a variety of ways; using different instructional methods will help meet the needs of the greatest number of learners ii.

The Educators’ Accessibility Toolkit provides guidelines and tips on how to make your courses and your teaching more accessible to students. These tips are in line with research on best practices in teaching and learning iii.

What are the characteristics of Accessible Education?

  • Takes into account a variety of student characteristics, including ethnicity, race, abilities, disabilities, age, gender, language abilities and preferred learning style.
  • Does not compromise academic rigour.
  • Is a proactive and inclusive way of teaching and designing courses and curricula.
  • Removes barriers to learning before they can affect anyone.
  • Reduces the need for specialized accommodations.
  • Identifies and clearly expresses the essential course content, while recognizing that students can express understanding of essential course content in multiple ways.
  • Is consistent with universally recognized principles of good teaching .
  • Is consistent with the spirit of the Accessibility of Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005.

Advantages for educators

(such as faculty, teaching assistants, course instructors and developers)

  • Often improves student learning.
  • Reduces the work associated with arranging individual and specialized accommodations.
  • May improve student engagement as it reaches a broader audience, which could lead to improved course evaluations.

Advantages for students

  • Less time spent on figuring out individual accommodations and more time focusing on course content.
  • Greater inclusion of students from a variety of backgrounds and abilities, which could lead to increased student retention.
  • Students are not singled out for being different.

Accessible Education is based on the social model of disability, as opposed to the medical modelV.

Medical model versus the social model of disability

Medical Model Social Model
Disability is a deficiency or abnormality. Disability is a difference.
Being disabled is negative. Being disabled, in itself, is neutral.
Disability resides in the individual. Disability arises from interactions between the individual and society.
The remedy for disability-related problems is cure or normalization of the individual. The remedy for disability-related problems is a change in the interactions between the individual and society.
The agent of remedy is the professional who affects the arrangements between the individual and society. The agent of remedy can be the individual, an advocate, or anyone who affects the arrangements between the individual and society.
As an educator, you have no responsibility to ensure accessibility; that is the job of the experts. As an educator, you are responsible for creating an accessible environment where all your students can learn.

 

Accessible Education aims to reduce dependence on the accommodation approach and move toward inclusion vi.

Accommodation versus the Accessible Education approach

Accommodation Accessible Education
Access is a problem for the individual and should be addressed by that person and the disability service program. Access issues stem from poorly designed environments and should be addressed by the designer.
Access is achieved through special accommodation and/or retrofitting existing requirements. As much as possible, the system or environment is designed to be used by all.
Access is reactive. Access is proactive.
Access is often provided in a separate location or through special treatment. Access is inclusive.
Access must be reconsidered each time a new individual uses the system. Access, as part of the course design and curriculum, is sustainable.

More resources

Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST): http://www.cast.org

Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology (DO-IT Centre): http://www.washington.edu/doit/

National Center on Universal Design for Learning: http://www.udlcenter.org

University of Guelph, Teaching Support Services, Centre for Open Learning and Educational Support, Universal Instructional Design Project: http://www.tss.uoguelph.ca/uid/

UDL-Universe: http://enact.sonoma.edu/udl


To obtain this document in an alternative format, please contact:

Council of Ontario Universities
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100, Toronto ON  M5G 1Z8
Tel: 416-979-2165 | communications@cou.on.ca  | Fax: 416-979-8635 | Web: www.cou.on.ca |

Created September 2012


[i] The term Accessible Education has been adopted to capture the value of two frameworks in improving the accessibility of university education: Universal Instructional Design (UID) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Both were informed by the architectural concept of Universal Design, which is “the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design.” (Center for Universal Design, The Principles of Universal Design)

“UID is not just about accessibility for persons with a disability – it’s about truly universal thinking – maximizing learning for students of all backgrounds and learner preferences while minimizing the need for special accommodations.” (University of Guelph, UID Implementation Guide)

“UDL is a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone – not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs.” (Center for Applied Special Technology, Universal Design for Learning)

[ii] Nilson, Linda B. (2010). Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors (3rd ed). John Wiley and Sons.

[iii] University of Guelph, UID Project, and the National Centre on UDL, Research Evidence.

[iv] Chickering and Gamson (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.

[v] Table is adapted from Gill, C. (1994). Two Models of Disability. Chicago Institute of Disability, University of Chicago, cited in University of Ottawa, Access Service – Student Academic Success Service. (no date) A guide for professors: Minimizing the impact of learning obstacles,

[vi] Ibid.